The son of the Israelite woman blasphemed the Name, and cursed; and they brought him to Moses. His mother’s name was Shelomith, the daughter of Dibri, of the tribe of Dan. They put him in custody, until Yahweh’s will should be declared to them. Yahweh spoke to Moses, saying, “Bring out of the camp him who cursed; and let all who heard him lay their hands on his head, and let all the congregation stone him. You shall speak to the children of Israel, […]
⛓ Read Leviticus 24 forward — the whole chapter and its afterlife →Where this passage surfaces again, sorted by the strength of the link. Each kind of reuse — formal quotation, deliberate allusion, faint echo, figural pattern — carries its own mark. Follow any reference to read it in place.
Echo1
A fainter, low-volume reuse, carried by recurrence or thematic coherence.
The grave sin of 'blaspheming the Name' is codified in the Holiness legislation on the blasphemer. The Pastoral fear that misconduct leads outsiders to blaspheme God's name may faintly trade on this background sense of the Name's sanctity, though the verbal link is general rather than specific.
Low confidence◇ Figural1
A typological pattern re-read in a later text — no verbal quotation, high figural coherence.
The law of the blasphemer: one who blasphemes the Name is brought before the assembly, witnesses are involved, and the offender is stoned outside the camp. Stephen is charged with 'blasphemous words' (6:11, 6:13) and will be stoned (ch. 7). Little verbal borrowing, but the legal-typological frame — blasphemy accusation issuing in stoning — is precisely this statute, which the trial scene self-consciously invokes.
Medium confidence